|
|
Great Western electrification a priority in Network Rail paper
|
THE electrification of the Great Western Main Line has been slated as a priority in Network Rail’s Route Utilisation Strategy paper on electrifying the nation’s railways.
The report asks whether further electrification will realise the three goals of the Depatment for Transport, and other local government; namely to lower operating costs, increase passenger utilisation and reduce environmental impact.
The Great Western main line, which connects London Paddington to the South-West, passing through the Thames Valley, has been revealed to have the highest benefit to cost ratio, together with the Midland main line. The initial capital outlay is offset by a reduction in long-term operational costs, the report says.
Electric trains emit 20-30% less carbon than their diesel counterparts, have better acceleration and breaking performance, and accommodate more passengers. There are also cost benefits: rolling stock operating costs are lower, the stock is more reliable, and it costs less to lease. |
|


|
The section of the track from London to Maidenhead is certain to be electrified due to the Crossrail project now underway, but Network Rail argues that further electrification to Bristol ‘is in the range of high value for money to financially positive’, thanks to high traffic and the relatively small section of track in question. Electrification is also considered beyond Bristol, and towards Swansea and Oxford, though the former is considered ‘low value.’
According to the report, the business case for the electrification of the Great Western main line is optimised if electrification is synchronised with the introduction of a Super Express fleet, which is part of First Great Western’s Intercity Express programme. Under this scenario, the benefits of electrification can be reaped as soon as the new trains are introduced.
Discussions are underway with the government to fund this component of the scheme through their Regulatory Asset Base. Costs would include the purchase of new electric rolling stock, the procurement of grid supply points, as well as the specification, procurement, manufacture and testing of efficient ‘delivery units.’ The report says this process is lengthy and works should be spread over a long period.
Network Rail will consider changes in costs and demand and the impact on the case for electrification. Currently, just 40% of the national rail network is electrified and it carries a similar proportion of the total passenger miles operated.
To download the Network Rail paper in full, click here.
|
|
Atkins study: Heathrow's westward connections
|
| |
Extending the London Underground to Slough, perhaps via Windsor, is slated as one
of the options to link the Great Western main line to Heathrow Airport in a study by
engineering consultancy Atkins. The Atkins report is one of many studies looking at
transport links from Britain’s biggest gateway. It considers projected demand as
well as engineering, cost and operational factors.
One proposed option would see a westbound chord built at the exit of the Heathrow
tunnel, enabling heavy rail services to operate directly from the airport to Slough,
Maidenhead and Reading. The cost is estimated at £460m, but the project would
face property rights and engineering issues.
Another option would have the Piccadilly Line extended to Slough, either through a
direct 8.8km tunnel, costing £1190m; or by making use of current Windsor lines,
costing nearly half that amount. The latter would add three minutes to the journey
time but necessitates less tunnelling and only 2.5km of new track. A potential pitfall
is the issue of congestion around the site of the proposed new station in Slough.
Also considered is a direct heavy rail link between Heathrow’s Terminal 5 and the
Great Western Main Line, using a track that runs west out of the airport. The link
could either join the main line at Langley, which would require 5.9km of new track
and cost £740m; or could use the existing underpass beneath the M25/M4
intersection and join up with the main line between the M25 and West Drayton. The
second option is just short of £200m cheaper, though Atkins concedes there is more
risk involved. Significantly, the westbound link would allow for higher traffic than a
reāengineered junction at the mouth of the Heathrow tunnel. |
 |
| A link westward: the proposed heavy rail link between T5 and the main line |
| To download a PDF version of the Atkins report, click here. |
| |
| |
|
|